Discussion on Text Narrative Features of Corporate ESG Disclosure in the Context of Sustainability Report Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/6bvysp82Keywords:
Sustainable Development Report, ESG Disclosure, Text Narrative, Impression Management, Institutional ConvergenceAbstract
The development of the world's sustainable disclosure system is promoting changes in corporate ESG reporting. In June 2023, the International Sustainability Standards Board issued the two core standards IFRS S1 and IFRS S2; in April 2024, the three main stock exchanges in the Chinese mainland released guidelines for sustainable development reporting of listed companies that are in good alignment with the ISSB Standards. ESG disclosure has moved from voluntary choice to institutionalised regulation. Based on the key nodes of the sustainable reporting system, this paper studies the text practice of ESG disclosure from three aspects: narrative framework, narrative strategy and narrative function. Based on the above results, institutional regulations lead to the convergence of narrative frameworks, but enterprises still achieve differentiation through tone adjustment, readability modification and rhetorical selection within the same framework. At the same time, the function of ESG reports is changing from single-information disclosure to a multi-faceted response of compliance, value communication and impression management. This paper will also investigate the mechanism of influence for regulatory pressure, corporate ESG performance and third-party verification, and believes that the tension between narrative convergence and strategy differentiation is the key to understanding the current features of ESG disclosure texts.
Downloads
References
[1] Cheng, J. (2026, May 18). First year of mandatory sustainability reporting sees notable gains in both quantity and quality. Economic Information Daily. http://jjckb.xinhuanet.com/20260518/6e8e3998ad1e4a509b2cf38fb087ace5/c.html
[2] Del Gesso, C., & Lodhi, R. N. (2025). Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: A systematic review of accounting studies. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(2), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143
[3] Wukich, J. J., Neuman, E. L., & Fogarty, T. J. (2024). Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(4), 673–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2023-0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2023-0013
[4] IFRS Foundation. (2023, June 26). ISSB issues inaugural global sustainability disclosure standards [Press release]. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/06/issb-issues-ifrs-s1-ifrs-s2/
[5] IFRS Foundation. (2025, December 11). ISSB issues targeted amendments to IFRS S2 to support implementation [Press release]. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2025/12/issb-issues-targeted-amendments-ifrs-s2/
[6] State Council. (2024, April 12). State Council opinions on strengthening regulation, preventing risks, and promoting high quality development of the capital market (Guo Fa [2024] No. 10). https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2024/issue_11306/202404/content_6947724.html
[7] China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2025, May 16). Reply to Proposal No. 01055 (Finance and Taxation Category 072) of the CPPCC National Committee. https://www.csrc.gov.cn/csrc/c101983/c7617079/content.shtml
[8] Elmanaseer, M. I., & Gerged, A. M. (2025). How do institutional pressures reshape the association between corporate sustainability disclosure and firm value in emerging economies? The moderating role of the audit committee function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6), 7253–7283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4340
[9] Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., Schiuma, G., & Troise, C. (2025). Investigating how mandatory sustainability reporting influences corporate governance effects on ESG performance: From obligation to impact for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(5), 6261–6282. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70025
[10] Zheng, C. (2026, May 11). 427 firms pass first mandatory ESG disclosure, 18 debutants set new benchmark. China Securities Journal. https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3901735.html
[11] China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2025, October 23). CSRC: Do not blindly pursue the number of sustainability report disclosures, but consider the pace of expanding coverage comprehensively. https://www.csrc.gov.cn/shanxi/c106408/c7590534/content.shtml
[12] De Villiers, C., & Alexander, D. (2014). The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001
[13] Zhang, X., Yang, L., Gao, Y., & Liu, X. (2019). What influences the use of rhetorical language in corporate social responsibility reports? Accounting Research, (6), 20–26.
[14] Toit, E. D., & Esterhuyse, L. (2023). Playing to which audience? Textual analysis of standalone sustainability reports in the South African mining sector. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 15(3), 294–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2023.132892
[15] Hu, K., & Sheng, D. (2020). A corpus based study on the image of Huawei company in the English translation of Sustainable Development Report. Journal of Foreign Languages, 43(6), 94–106.
[16] Dong, D. (2024, December 18). China issues basic standards for sustainable information disclosure to facilitate comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development. Xinhua Finance. https://finance.sina.cn/2024 12 18/detail inczwpwv7767300.d.html
[17] Iazzi, A., Papa, A., Palladino, R., & Lamusta, S. (2025). Evaluating companies' impression management tactics in mandatory sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6), 6828–6848. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4326
[18] Sun, Y., Zhao, D., & Cao, Y. (2024). The impact of ESG performance, reporting framework, and reporting assurance on the tone of ESG disclosures: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 466, 142698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142698
[19] Posadas, S. C., Ruiz Blanco, S., Fernandez Feijoo, B., & Tarquinio, L. (2023). Institutional isomorphism under the test of Non financial Reporting Directive. Evidence from Italy and Spain. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar 01 2023 0189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2022-1606
[20] Nicolo, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G., & Polcini, P. T. (2025). Ready for change after the omnibus package? Early compliance with the European sustainability reporting standards and its key determinants in the new regulatory era. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 9040–9058. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70054
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Finance and Accounting
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
