Market Failures and the Stakeholders Left Behind

Authors

  • Kaijie Liu Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, 10003, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/r62swt22

Keywords:

Market Failure, Information Asymmetry, Algorithmic Discrimination, Public Goods

Abstract

Information asymmetry, monopsony power, and the failure by a social group to provide public goods are market failures that harm stakeholders in a systematic way in capitalistic systems of the present day. Four interrelated market failures discussed in this paper include algorithmic wage discrimination in the labor markets of the gig economy, the exploitation of information asymmetry in financial and gambling markets, the collapse of journalism as an under-funded public good and the amplification of misinformation in the attention economy of social media. By examining algorithmic management practices, platform practices that have become predatory, and how this approach to the newspaper industry by disrupting the advertising-abundant model puts the newspaper industry at risk, this study is able to show how these failures generate reinforcing feedback loops to consolidate corporate power and at the expense of vulnerable stakeholders. The paper shows that algorithmic opacities can be used to exploit all industries, diluted journalism undermines accountability, and corporate cross-platform dominance speeds up system inequalities. The evidence suggests that without the transparency, fairness, and stakeholder-oriented practices being adopted by businesses and regulated by the government, the market mechanisms cannot stop the systematic extraction of value out of workers, consumers, and communities, which will require a radical shift in the corporate governance and the governmental policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Teachout, Z. (2023). Algorithmic personalized wages. Politics & Society, 51(3), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292231183828

[2] NYU Stern. (n.d.). Sign in. https://mediasite.stern.nyu.edu/Mediasite/Play/11fa2725f2004cedaaf80defb11011b91d

[3] Pickard, V. (2020, March 12). Journalism’s market failure is a crisis for democracy. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/03/journalisms-market-failure-is-a-crisis-for-democracy

[4] Dubal, V. (2023). On algorithmic wage discrimination. Columbia Law Review, 123(7), 1929–2000. https://www.columbialawreview.org/content/on-algorithmic-wage-discrimination/

[5] Muldoon, J., & Raekstad, P. (2023). Algorithmic domination in the gig economy. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221082078

[6] Vallas, S. P., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

[7] Pickard, V. (2020). Democracy without journalism?: Confronting the misinformation society. Oxford University Press.

[8] Lorenz-Spreen, B., et al. (2024). Social drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 770–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231185057

[9] Shahrezaye, L., et al. (2025). The algorithmic knowledge gap within and between countries: Implications for combatting misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-153

[10] Khraiche, S., & Jabri, R. (2025). Platform capitalism and the gig economy: Surplus value extraction in the age of algorithmic labor. Socialism and Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2025.2520478

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, K. (2026). Market Failures and the Stakeholders Left Behind. Academic Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(3), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.54691/r62swt22