Green Credit, ESG Ratings, and Corporate Carbon Emission Management Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/5cj9h607Keywords:
Green credit, ESG ratings, carbon emission management, green finance, ESG divergence, carbon disclosure, sustainable financeAbstract
Green Finance Interaction with Corporate Sustainability: An essential topic to explore for investigating whether improvements in carbon emissions are accelerating as a result of changes in market operations. Through a study of the mechanism by which green credit policies and ESG rating information together affect corporate carbon-emission-related behaviour to explore the complementary relationship and contradictions among these two indicators. Based on the theory of stakeholders, signal transmission, regulatory compliance and others, this paper constructs an analytical framework for exploring how green credit acts through financial cost channels and monitoring mechanisms to stimulate low-carbon investments; Based on these theories, it is also expected that changes in ESG ratings will affect companies'carbon disclosure and management behaviours by altering reputation alcosts and capital-market signals. Based on this, it has been found that there is a structural contradiction between the substantial carbon-reduction incentive embedded in well-structured green credit systems and the symbolic-compliance strategy driven by ESG rating divergences; Therefore, to improve corporate carbon-management efficiency, coordination among newgreenfinance-instrument design and ESG-disclosure-standardisation should be established.
Downloads
References
[1] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement. UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
[2] People's Bank of China. (2022). China Green Finance Development Report 2022. PBC Green Finance Committee. http://www.greenfinance.org.cn
[3] Climate Bonds Initiative. (2022). Green Bond Market Summary 2022. CBI. https://www.climatebonds.net/resources/reports/green-bond-market-summary-2022
[4] Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. (2022). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2022. GSIA. https://www.gsi-alliance.org/trends-report-2022/
[5] Equator Principles Association. (2020). The Equator Principles (EP4). https://equator-principles.com/app/uploads/The-Equator-Principles-July-2020.pdf
[6] Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
[7] World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised ed.). WRI/WBCSD.
[8] CDP. (2022). CDP Global Climate Change Report 2022. CDP. https://www.cdp.net/en/research/global-reports/global-climate-change-report-2022
[9] Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
[10] Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green Bonds. J Finance Educ, 13 (8), 499-516.
[11] Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111.
[12] Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29, 425–430.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Finance and Accounting

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







